Legal Opinion

Perry v. American Bakeries Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 465PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

Plaintiff was injured by accident. The question for decision is whether the injury “arose out of and in the course of” his employment. G.S. 97-2(6).

“The term ‘arising out of employment’, it has been said, is broad and comprehensive and perhaps not capable of precise definition. It must be interpreted in the light of the facts and circumstances of each case, and there must be some causal connection between the injury and the employment.” Berry v. Furniture Co., 232 N.C. 303, 306, 60 S.E. 2d 97. To be compensable an injury must spring from the employment or have its origin therein. An injury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Taylor v. Twin City ClubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Duncan v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API