Legal Opinion

Reco Transportation, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission of North Carolina

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1986No. 8528SC1259PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The only issue that we must decide is whether the findings of fact made by ESC were sufficient to support the conclusion of law that drivers hauling, other than owner-operators, are employees of RECO for purposes of G.S. Ch. 96. G.S. 96-8(6) states the following:

‘Employment’ means service performed including service in interstate commerce . . . performed for wage or under any contract of hire, written or oral, express or implied, in which the relationship of the individual performing such service and the employing unit for which such service is rendered is, as to such service,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Scott v. Waccamaw Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Watkins v. MurrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Smith v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT & LIBERTY MUT. INS.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. Hennis Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. Davie CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Fair v. St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Housecalls Nursing Services, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Binney v. Banner Therapy ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API