Legal Opinion

Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1977No. 95PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

At the time of the collision, G.S. 97-12 provided in relevant part as follows:

“No compensation shall be payable if the injury or death was occasioned by the intoxication of the employee. . . . The burden of proof shall be upon him who claims an exception or forfeiture under this section.” (Emphasis supplied.)

This statute was amended by the 1975 General Assembly to read as follows:

“No compensation shall be payable if the injury or death to the employee was proximately caused by .. . [h]is intoxication. . . . The burden of proof shall be on him who claims an exemption or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Gant v. CrouchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Moses v. BartholomewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. McAninch v. Buncombe County SchoolsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API