Allred v. Allred-Gardner, Incorporated
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The essential facts are not in dispute. They are correctly stated in the findings of the deputy commissioner. The sole question presented is whether claimant sustained an injury arising out of andi in the course of his employment. This is a mixed question of law and fact.
The defendants contend the cause of the accident was the claimant’s loss of control of his vehicle by reason of his having blacked out; that the blackout was totally unrelated to his employment and that the use of an automobile upon the highway subjected claimant to no greater hazard than that to which the public is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Tapp v. TappTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Hardy v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Archie v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Taylor v. Twin City ClubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Immer and Company v. BrosnahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.