Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 89PA82PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

It is axiomatic that an opinion and award entered by the Industrial Commission may not be disturbed on appeal unless a patent error of law exists therein. See G.S. 97-86; Godley v. County of Pitt, and cases there cited, 306 N.C. 357, 293 S.E. 2d 807 (1982). In the instant case, our review is directed toward the resolution of a single issue: whether the Commission erred as a matter of law in finding and concluding that plaintiff’s injury arose out of and occurred in the course of his employment as a truck driver for defendant. We disagree with the Court of Appeals and hold…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Deseth v. LensCrafters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Roman v. Southland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Pollock v. Reeves Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API