Legal Opinion

Leymel v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1930No. Docket No. 275PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

At all times material to this appeal appellant was instructor in the Fresno High School and respondents composed the board of trustees of the high school district. In July, 1928, the parties hereto executed a written contract employing appellant as an instructor in the Fresno High School for the year 1928-1929. This was a renewal of a former contract and the services of appellant were entirely satisfactory. At the general election held in 1926 appellant was elected a member of the state Legislature. He qualified and served during the session of 1927 and was re-elected in 1928, serving during…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Chenoweth v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Duncan v. KoustenisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Mott v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API