Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Rapsey

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1940No. S. F. 16379PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto instituted by plaintiff and appellant with the authorization of the Attorney-General of California pursuant to the provisions of section 803 of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine by what right and authority the defendant and respondent held the office of city judge of the city of San Bruno in San Mateo County. The city of San Bruno is a city of the sixth class, organized pursuant to the provisions of sections 850 et seq., of the Municipal Corporations Act (Deering’s General Laws, Act 5233).

The complaint alleged that on May 14,1924, the city council…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Howard v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  4. Stubbs v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
  5. People Ex Rel. Goodell v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Reilly v. OzzardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. People v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People Ex Rel. Clancy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API