Patton v. Board of Health Etc.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Plaintiff brings this action against the board of health of the city and county of San Francisco for a writ of mandate requiring it to admit plaintiff to the position of health inspector and to approve certain of his demands on the treasury for salary accruing since his removal.
The court found as facts that the board of health appointed plaintiff on August 6, 1895, as one of the six health inspectors provided to be appointed by section 3009 of the Political Code; that the board of health, in its order appointing plaintiff, did not specify or in any manner limit the term for which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823
- C. C. Clark and Others v. . E. R. Stanley and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Attorney General v. TillinghastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.