Curtin v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover against the state of California the aggregate sum of $11,947 for services rendered and moneys expended for and in behalf of said state. The authority for the maintenance of such an action against the state is to be found in an act of the legislature of 1921, entitled, “An Act to authorize suits against the state for services rendered to the state or moneys expended in connection • with such services, and regulating the procedure therein.” (Stats. 1921, p. 1592.)
The plaintiff, from and including the year 1909 to and including the year 1913, which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kimbrough v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Spreckels v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Winsor v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Jewett v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.