Legal Opinion

Chenoweth v. Chambers

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1917No. Civ. No. 1644PublishedCited by 32 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to compel the State Controller to issue his warrant for a portion of petitioner’s salary as auditor of the state board of prison directors. The facts are stated in the oipnion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Petitioner seeks the writ of mandate to compel respondent to issue his warrant for the payment of a portion of petitioner’s salary. Petitioner was elected a member of the assembly for the fourteenth assembly district at the general election of November 3, 1914. His term of office began on the first Monday after the first day of January, 1915, and ended, by operation of law, on January 8, 1917. He duly qualified as such assemblyman and performed his duties as a member of the assembly at the forty-first regular session thereof and also at the special session held in January, 1916. He resigned…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. People Ex Rel. Sherwood v. State Board of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Ellis v. LennonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Smith v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Ryan v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API