State v. Yellorday
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.. [1] We consider first defendants’ assignment of error No. 6, that the trial judge erred in denying their motions for judgments as of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence. In a criminal case the rule is that, upon a motion to nonsuit, the court must consider the evidence “in the light most favorable to the State, all contradictions and discrepancies therein must be resolved in its favor and it must be given the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence.” State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379, 382, 156 S.E. 2d 679, 681 (1967). Under this rule,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BlackstockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.