Legal Opinion

State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1976No. 44PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant contends that the court erred in not permitting James M. Long of the South Carolina Bar to represent Hunter at the trial. He says that this action of the trial court denied him his right to counsel under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. As authority for this position he cites United States v. Johnston, 318 F. 2d 288 (6th Cir. 1963) and United States v. *567Bergamo, 154 F. 2d 31 (3d Cir. 1946). The present case is distinguishable from these cases on the basis of its facts.

Defendant was ably represented by local counsel in Union County, Mr. James Griffin, as well as…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API