Legal Opinion

State v. Mapp

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1980No. 7910SC824PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The defendant contends in her first assignment of error that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for nonsuit as to all charges against her. We disagree.

Upon a motion for nonsuit in a criminal case, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. All contradictions and discrepancies must be resolved in the State’s favor, and it must be given the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence. State v. Yellorday, 297 N.C. 574, 578, 256 S.E. 2d 205 (1979); State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379, 382, 156 S.E. 2d 679 (1967).

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Goldade v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. RichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. QuallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API