Legal Opinion

State v. Ramey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1986No. 105A86PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant has brought forth numerous assignments of error on appeal. He contends: (1) the trial court erred by allowing the victim to testify regarding prior sexual acts of the defendant; (2) the trial court committed plain error by failing to instruct the jury, without request from the defendant, as to the limited purpose for which the jury could consider testimony of prior sexual acts; (3) the trial court committed error by expressing an opinion as to facts in controversy; (4) the trial court committed plain error by permitting certain witnesses to testify that the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API