Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1988No. 8820SC458PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

By his first argument, defendant contends the “court erred in admitting testimony as to alleged criminal conduct by the defendant without any limitations as to time and place, and by failing to instruct the jury on corroborative evidence and failure to instruct the jury that in order to convict the defendant of first degree rape the jury must believe the events occurred on August 29, 1986, after being requested to do so.”

Evidence of other sexual acts committed by defendant against the victim is clearly admissible under Rule 404 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. United States v. Donald K. WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. CabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API