State v. Stegmann
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The trial court admitted over objection the testimony of fourteen character witnesses offered by the State to show the good character and reputation of the prosecuting witness. Defendant’s second and third assignments of error are based upon admission of this testimony. Following is a brief narration of the evidence in question.
*644Roger Frazee, manager of Aetna Finance Company where Mrs. Ruth Kendall had been working for fourteen months, testified that he knew her character and reputation in the community in which she lived and that it was outstanding.
Gilda Smith testified she…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.