Legal Opinion
Amdahl v. Green Giant Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1993No. C2-92-1611, C8-92-1709PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Respondents Don Amdahl, Harold Berg-strom, and Thomas Miller commenced this action in Meeker County District Court against appellant Green Giant Company seeking recovery of losses arising out of vegetable acreage contracts entered into with appellant Green Giant Company. In their complaint, respondents allege violations of the Minnesota Securities Act (Count I) and breach of contract (Count II). Appellant Green Giant challenges the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration of the breach of contract claim. Green Giant also challenges summary judg ment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Marshall v. Green Giant Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Churchill Environmental & Industrial Equity Partners, L.P. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson FarmsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Community Partners Designs, Inc. v. City of LonsdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.