Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellant Cargill Incorporated appeals from summary judgment dismissing its breach-of-contract claim against respondent Jorgenson Farms, arguing that it was denied the opportunity to conduct necessary discovery, that genuine issues of material fact regarding the formation of a contract between the parties preclude summary judgment, and that the district court erred by denying its motion to compel arbitration and by granting respondent’s motion for attorney fees under Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2004). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Cargill Incorporated is an international provider…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N. P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- CITY OF GENESEO. v. Utilities PlusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Antler Ridge, LLC v. Citizens State Bank-Midwest, Perry HillmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Patrick's Restaurant, LLC v. SinghDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.