Legal Opinion

Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 2006No. A05-2287PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant Cargill Incorporated appeals from summary judgment dismissing its breach-of-contract claim against respondent Jorgenson Farms, arguing that it was denied the opportunity to conduct necessary discovery, that genuine issues of material fact regarding the formation of a contract between the parties preclude summary judgment, and that the district court erred by denying its motion to compel arbitration and by granting respondent’s motion for attorney fees under Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2004). We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Cargill Incorporated is an international provider…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N. P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. CITY OF GENESEO. v. Utilities PlusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Antler Ridge, LLC v. Citizens State Bank-Midwest, Perry HillmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Patrick's Restaurant, LLC v. SinghDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API