Legal Opinion

State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1991No. 89-2076PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that the court of appeals erred in finding these Cleveland police investigations did not create a “confidential law enforcement investigatory record” under R.C. 149.43(A)(2). We remand for an in camera inspection and redaction of protected information contained in these investigative files. We further hold the court of appeals did not err in declining to apply the “trial preparation record” exception under R.C. 149.43(A)(4), nor did it abuse its discretion in declining to award NBC attorney fees.

I

Confidential Law Enforcement Investigatory Record

Cleveland argues that the court of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Polovischak v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Zuern v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API