Legal Opinion

Henneman v. City of Toledo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1988No. 87-335PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The principal question posed by this appeal is whether information and records compiled by a police department pursuant to its internal investigation of alleged police misconduct are subject to an executive privilege, either qualified or absolute, protecting such information and records from the normal discovery requirements of civil litigation. We hold that such evidence must be disclosed upon a proper discovery request if, pursuant to an in camera inspection, the trial judge determines that the public interest in the confidentiality of such information is outweighed by the litigant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
  5. Crawford v. DominicDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Wallace v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Grandview Hospital & Medical Center v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Babets v. Secretary of Human ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API