Legal Opinion

Warden v. Kahn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1979No. Civ. 43440PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

Plaintiff Lew Warden’s appeal is from the superior court’s judgment dismissing his action against defendants Melvin Kahn, Julius Kahn, Lorin Blum, and Blum & Blum, a law corporation. That judgment includes the dismissal of plaintiff’s first amended complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action against any of the defendants, and the dismissal of plaintiff’s second amended complaint on the ground that its contents exceeded the permission which the court had granted for the filing of an amended pleading. Our conclusion is that the court did not abuse its…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API