Legal Opinion

People v. Ralph

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1944No. Crim. 4533; Crim. 4535PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Each of the three defendants in these consolidated eases pleaded guilty to charges of committing robbery while armed with a deadly weapon. The court thereupon “Upon a statement of facts and by stipulation of counsel” found the crimes to be robbery of the first degree, granted the requests of defendants for leave to file applications for probation, and set a time (later postponed) for hearings upon such applications and for the pronouncement of judgments and sentences. The record shows that defendant Cant-Ion was then 18 years of age and defendants Ralph and Chandler were each 20. On March 31,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People v. McNabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. HambergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API