Legal Opinion
Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1961No. S. F. No. 20690PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Certain of the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company after its general demurrer to an amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
Plaintiffs on September 19, 1957, brought an action against Pacific States Securities Corporation, some of its officers, and certain defendants sued under fictitious names, to recover securities and moneys. The complaint, without making any distinction between those sued by their true names and those designated by fictitious names, alleged that “defendants” acted as brokers and agents…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Santamarina, Guiller v. Sears RoebuckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.