Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2006No. S124739PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

The complaint in this case alleges that employees at the Atlanta-based branch of defendant Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (SSB)—a large, nationwide brokerage firm that has numerous offices and does extensive business in California—repeatedly have recorded telephone conversations with California clients without the clients’ knowledge or consent. These facts give rise to a classic choice-of-law issue, because the relevant California privacy statute generally prohibits any person from recording a telephone conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Anschutz Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Global Comm. Trading Grp. v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API