Legal Opinion
Cressey v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1935No. Civ. 10575PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial by the court without a jury.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondent (Ah Gett v. Carr, 3 Cal. App. 47, 48 [84 Pac. 458]), the facts in the instant case are:
The sidewalk on the Leeward Avenue side of the First Baptist Church in the City of Los Angeles is paved from the property line to the street curb with the exception of several areas in which trees were growing at the time the improvement was made. February 14, 1934, the civil works administration workers, under the direction of appellant,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Van Praag v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ah Gett v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Howard v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sheldon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.