Ah Gett v. Carr

The defendants prosecute this appeal from a judgment against them and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. The action is based on two accounts stated. One of these accounts was stated with plain tiff and the other with one Ah Teet, for whom plaintiff acted in making the settlements hereinafter referred to. The statement of the accounts was admitted, and the principal question presented involves the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict on the issue of payment. The evidence was conflicting, and in stating the substance thereof we will, as in duty bound under…