Legal Opinion
Bady v. Detwiler
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 1954No. Civ. 20044PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
The city of Los Angeles appeals from three consolidated judgments against it entered on eight jury verdicts in favor of the several plaintiffs in actions for damages for personal injuries. Liability was imposed on the city under the Public Liability Act of 1923, now sections 53050 and 53051 of the Government Code, sometimes referred to as the “act.” A motion for a new trial was denied.
On Sunday morning, August 5, 1951, at about 7:30 a. m., a collision between an automobile driven by Frank Perkins and one driven by Margaret Detwiler occurred at the intérsection of Jefferson Boulevard…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Behr v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Johnson v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Dudum v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.