Legal Opinion
Howard v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1937No. Civ. 1835PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of George A. Howard, a minor, in the sum of $1250, Edith Howard, a minor, for nothing, and George Howard, their father, in the sum of $286.09, against the City of Fresno, a municipal corporation organized and existing under a freeholders’ charter. The action was brought under section two of an act approved June 13, 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 675), which we will call the Public Liability Act.
At the time of his injury on October 6, 1935, George A. Howard was of the age of ten years. On that day he went with his mother, two adult friends and several…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Ziegler v. Santa Cruz City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Gentekos v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.