Legal Opinion

Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevitt

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2989PublishedCited by 58 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Kuster, Loeb & Loeb, and Edward G. Kuster, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This action was brought to recover money claimed to be due plaintiff upon: 1. An alleged contract of sale by plaintiff to defendant of a crop of oranges belonging to plaintiff; 2. A similar alleged contract between one B. Maes and defendant for Maes’s oranges; and 3. Similar alleged contracts between plaintiff’s father, J. M. Leavens, and defendant, with respect to oranges, lemons, and grape fruit, the claims of Maes and J. M. Leavens having been assigned to plaintiff. Defendant denied that it ever entered into any of the alleged contracts, claiming that it received all fruit asserted to have…

2Cited by58 opinions

  1. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Preis v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API