Koeberle v. Hotchkiss
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for $28,808.20 in favor of the plaintiff based on the written agreement of the defendants to pay the plaintiff 10 per cent of any and all royalties when and as received by the defendants from an oil lease covering a tract of 10 acres on Signal Hill, which the plaintiff in the year 1921 was instrumental in procuring for the defendants with the General Petroleum Corporation, as lessee.
Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the respondent, which it is our duty to do where the contention is made that the evidence is insufficient, it appears that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Estate v. WikmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- McCarthy v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by45 opinions
- Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. GrovesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Wilson v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.