Legal Opinion

Leviston v. Tonningsen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14095PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff, defendant Tonningsen, and trustee interveners appeal from a judgment declaring that defendant Tonningsen holds the title to certain described real property in trust for intervener Golden Gate Land Association. By its judgment the trial court declared that the entire beneficial title to the property was vested in the Golden Gate Land Association and that none of the other parties had any right, title’or interest therein.

The action was commenced by the executrix of the will of one Charles L. Patton, against Tonningsen and other named defendants (all of whom except…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Butler v. HylandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wilkerson v. SeibCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API