Butler v. Hyland
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
— Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit, and from an order refusing a new trial.
*579Plaintiff’s father, as she avers, died June 5, 1858, leaving, as heirs, plaintiff, aged eight years, and her brother, aged about fourteen. Her mother had previously died. Her father was the .owner, at the time of his death, of the lot in controversy. Just before her father’s death, her aunt, who was a widow with three children, the present defendants, came to live with her father on the lot in suit, and plaintiff became at once a member of her aunt’s family, and lived with her until her own…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by30 opinions
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.