Cooney v. Glynn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bishop, Hoefler, Cook & Harwood, and Alfred J. Harwood, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant upon motion for a non-suit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence.
The action was begun by the deceased, Margaret J. Cooney,, in her lifetime. The present plaintiff was substituted during-the pendency thereof, upon the death of Margaret J. Cooney..
The complaint states a case to enforce a constructive trust in. real estate. In substance it shows the following facts: Bridget Gallagher was the mother of Margaret J. Cooney, the original plaintiff, and of Thomas J. -Glynn, the defendant. In the year ■ 1891 she…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bradley Co. v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.