Legal Opinion
Schaefer v. Berinstein
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 1960No. Civ. 23326; Civ. 23360PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
Two appeals are before this court. They will be considered together since the two actions were tried together in the trial court. Each case has been before this court on a prior appeal with respect to the sufficiency of the pleadings of the plaintiff. (Schaefer v. Berinstein, 140 Cal.App.2d 278 [295 P.2d 113]; Terry v. Bender, 143 Cal.App.2d 198 [300 P.2d 119].) Herein reference will be made to them as the Schaefer case and the Terry case, respectively.
In each instance, the appeal of the plaintiff is from the judgment, from the order denying a motion for a new trial, from the order denying a…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Cal Pak Delivery, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.