Legal Opinion

Norton v. Bassett

California Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1908No. L.A. No. 1972PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This cause was originally decided on appeal by the district court of appeals for the second appellate district. The judgment of the superior court was there affirmed and on petition of appellant the case was ordered to this court to be reheard.

The action was brought to have a trust declared and for an accounting of the rents, issues, and profits and the proceeds of sale of a portion of the trust property. Plaintiffs obtained judgment and the defendant Bassett appealed from it and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It was alleged in the complaint that in February, 1895, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Butler v. HylandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API