Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ganley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1996No. C4-95-1379PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent John G. Ganley. The petition makes three claims: trust account violations of Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.15(a)(2) and (e), and Opinion 15 of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board; false notarization in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct, Rule 3.3(a)(1) and (4), and 8.4(b), (e) and (d); and misrepresentation in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.4 and 8.4(c). The Director recommended a two-year suspen sion. We agree that Mr.…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Discipline of GubbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re the Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Frank Arend SCHULTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 244934Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against DedefoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of GanleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997