Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Pike

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1987No. F005136PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAMLIN, J.

Statement of the Case

On April 15, 1982, Charles Burrow (plaintiff) and Beverly Burrow 1 filed a complaint for damages against defendants Kenneth Pike as the operator and Parker & Sons Trucking as the owner of a truck which struck plaintiff while plaintiff was working for the State of California, Department of Transportation (appellant).

After first filing and then dismissing a petition to intervene in plaintiff’s lawsuit based on appellant’s payment to plaintiff of workers’ compensation expenses, 2 appellant filed a notice of lien claim against any judgment entered in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Tate v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Catello v. I.T.T. General ControlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Howard Contracting, Inc. v. G.A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Garcia v. Hyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Fort Bragg Unified School District v. Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API