Legal Opinion

Catello v. I.T.T. General Controls

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1984No. Civ. 22831PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COUZENS, J. *

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order striking its cost bill submitted following the voluntary dismissal of a complaint in intervention. We will reverse.

Facts

Ernest Catello was injured when an oven exploded at his place of employment. He filed a complaint for personal injuries against I.T.T. General Controls (I.T.T.) as manufacturer of the defective oven. Thereafter, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual), the workers’ compensation carrier for Catello’s employer, filed its complaint in intervention to recover some $31,000 in benefits paid Catello.

On the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Garcia v. Hyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Adler v. VaiciusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API