Legal Opinion

Tate v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1963No. Civ. 26836PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

This proceeding involves the application of the principle of Witt v. Jackson, 57 Cal.2d 57 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641], to a personal injury action which was at issue before that case was decided. A plaintiff, who has received compensation from his employer, has brought a common-law negligence action against three other parties. These defendants now desire to plead that the employer was also negligent, attempting thereby to bar such portion of the plaintiff’s recovery as would be applied to the benefit of the employer.

The facts before this court, as set forth in the petition and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Eastwood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Haney v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API