Legal Opinion

Shampagne v. Keplinger

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1927No. 6,053PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toole

The relief sought in this action is damages for an alleged violation and restraint of plaintiff’s personal liberty. A demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was sustained. Plaintiff suffered judgment of dismissal, from which she appeals.

The complaint alleged the official capacity of defendant as police magistrate of a town in this state; that on August 13, 1925, at this town, defendant wilfully, wrongfully, maliciously and unlawfully, and without any legal justification, violated and restrained plaintiff’s personal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Stewart v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Billesbach v. LarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Galusha v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. BurrisArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Holland v. LutzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Granger v. ErieMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Walker v. Board of Com'rsMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tillinger v. FrisbieMontana Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API