Billesbach v. Larkey
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment given against them in the court below. A demurrer to the third amended complaint was sustained and thereupon the judgment was rendered, leave to amend further being refused. The decision depends on the sufficiency of the complaint in the particulars pointed out by the demurrer.
The complaint alleges that the defendant is a physician and was employed by plaintiffs on December 22, 1907, to cure the plaintiff, Florence, of a malady from which she was then suffering. In the course of his professional duties toward her he gave her a written…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Gautier v. General Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Reios v. MardisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Dressler v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.