Legal Opinion

Holland v. Lutz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 15, 1965No. 44,010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This is an appeal from an order overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. The demurrer set forth two grounds: (1) That the petition fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and (2) misjoinder of causes of action. However, the defendants (appellants) now rely solely on the first ground of their demurrer and, in this opinion, we shall confine ourselves to that point.

In substance, the petition alleges that the defendants, Buford J. Lutz and Norman E. Gaar, were, respectively, the duly elected,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Smith v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Comer v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. General Finance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Knight v. Neodesha Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  3. Robert N. Cowdrey v. City of Eastborough, Kansas David Wilson, and David Vickery, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Allen v. Board of Com'rs of County of WyandotteDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. Huendling v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API