Galusha v. Fraser
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The object of the action was to recover damages on account of fraud and deceit alleged to have been perpetrated by the defendants upon the plaintiff and his predecessor in interest, whereby they were induced to purchase a lot in the Silver Strand tract, near Ocean Park, from the defendants A. R. Fraser, G. M. Jones, and H. R. Gage. The Guaranty Realty Company is also made a party defendant. Fraser, Jones, and Gage filed a joint demurrer to the second amended complaint on two grounds, namely, that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Haley v. Santa Fe Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Harvey v. GriffithsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Shell Western E & P, Inc. v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.