Legal Opinion
Ghory v. Al-Lahham
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1989No. A037759PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
The Labor Commissioner awarded appellant Saliba Ghory overtime and penalty wages from respondents Issa and Nicola AlLahham, individually, and collectively doing business as Lahham Service Center and as Millbrae Mobil, his former employers. After a hearing pursuant to Labor Code section 98.2, the trial court ordered entry of judgment in favor of respondents. Because the trial court did not apply the controlling law to the facts, we must reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment in favor of appellant.
Background
The facts are undisputed. Appellant worked for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Wilkinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Barnhill v. Robert Saunders & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Davis v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hernandez v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Armenta v. Osmose, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Earley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.