Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.—
In this matter, a companion to Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 116 [96 Cal.Rptr.2d 485, 999 P.2d 718] (Kraus), we address additional issues arising out of a representative action brought under the unfair competition law (UCL). (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.)1 Defendant and petitioner Purolator Air Filtration Products Company (Purolator) contends, as did the defendants in Kraus, that failure to certify this action as a class action denied it due process. It also argues that the Court of Appeal erred in holding that an order to disgorge the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by293 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Martinez v. Metabolife International., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.