Legal Opinion

Earley v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 2000No. B134741PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

This case arises out of a claim made by petitioners on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated to recover unpaid overtime compensation. Petitioners, Carol Earley, Donna Alvarez and Martin Garcia (hereafter petitioners), seek review of the trial court’s order, made as part of a class certification process, which required a particular notice to be mailed to absent class members giving them the option of “opting out” of petitioners’ class action to recover unpaid overtime compensation from defendant and real party in interest herein, Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API