Legal Opinion

Davis v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1940No. Civ. 6231PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

A joint and several judgment was rendered against the appellants, as members of a mining partnership, for unpaid wages of a superintendent of the enterprise, together with a penalty for wilfully failing to pay the same as provided by section 203 of the Labor Code of California. From that judgment this appeal was perfected.

It is contended the judgment is not supported by the evidence ; that the wages were not due, for the reason that the plaintiff merely contributed his services as a member of the partnership; that the written agreement of partnership establishes a limitation of liability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. May v. New York Motion Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Manford v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Jacobson v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Christie v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. First National Bank of Dixon v. SpanglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API