Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PHELAN, J.
Appellant Kirby Hudgins (hereafter appellant or Hudgins) seeks review of a judgment entered upon stipulated facts presented in connection with the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. After a long and tortuous series of proceedings—involving first an order granting appellant’s motion, then a mistaken issuance of an order granting the motion of respondent Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (hereafter respondent or Neiman Marcus), a motion for clarification, a second order granting appellant’s motion, a motion by respondent for reconsideration, belated intervention by the state…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Barnhill v. Robert Saunders & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Aguilar v. Association for Retarded CitizensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Koehl v. Verio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.