Legal Opinion

Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1995No. F020310PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

In the published portion of this opinion we will uphold the trial court’s decisions on two novel issues: (1) that plaintiff and respondent Brian E. Nordquist, a television station sports director/newscast anchor, is entitled to overtime compensation under subdivision 3 of Industrial Welfare Commission Order No. 11-80 (IWC Order No. 11-80) because he was not exempt as a professional or administrative employee, “engaged in work which is primarily intellectual, managerial, or creative,” and “which requires exercise of discretion and independent judgment” (Cal. Code Regs., tit.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Edward W. Dalheim v. Kdfw-TvCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API