Legal Opinion
Smith v. Janey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 24, 2009No. Civil Action No. 06-1671 (PLF)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs motions for leave to amend or correct his complaint and to re-open or extend discovery. For the reasons stated, the defendants’ motion will be granted and all other pending motions will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis and filing a complaint pro se, alleges employment discrimination and sues under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Scott v. District Hospital Partners, L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Cornish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Musgrove v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Cooper v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.